Debatte

This is a picture of some comments wanting the current PM of Malaysia to step down on a news article in the Malaysian Insider. The comment which shall be discussed is zakk's comment, which says


"Actually, the longer he (Najib) stays (as Prime Minister of Malaysia) the better it is for PR."

Question:
Is this what we want? Do you want best for PR, if you are a PR member, and do you want what is best for BN if you are a BN member? And if you are independent, ie: not attached to any political party; would you want what is best for yourself?

No. We (should) want what is best for Malaysia.

If someone should step down, then tell them. LET'S SAY, the current PM were incompetent (tak layak), and you were a PR member. Would you turn a blind eye, and let Malaysia rot and go to the dogs (hancur binasa etc) ?

No, you (should) want what is best for Malaysia.

Who comes first, Malaysia or PR? Malaysia or BN? Malaysia or your Persatuan? It should be your country, not your political party.

EXAMPLE: A debate in Parliament.
A debate on the use of renewable energy is proposed by someone from the opposition, and let's say you were from the government. Would you say no, just because he or she is from the opposition? Do you want what is best for the environment, or play stupid childish political games for political gains?

Merdekekah kita lol? Bla3 patriotisme konon, kibar jalur gemilang konon, bla bla bla, at the end of the day, kawan sendiri buat salah tak mengapa, orang lain buat benda betul pun tetap halang lol